Creative Classy my —!

Anyone working even remotely near the cultural policy world, will be familiar with Richard Florida’s contribution to the creative cities debate. In a nutshell it goes like this…ship in the hipsters, the geeks, and the gays, then add water, stir, wait for a wee while and your city will be basking in economic growth!

OK, so that may be a simplistic reading but nonetheless it’s been refreshing to be finally having a very public debate about Florida’s ideas – ideas that many policy wonks have adopted wholeheartedly and often without any robust analysis of their own. For an alternative view of Florida’s world, take a look at this article by Frank Bures titled The Fall of the Creative Class. While it does have a ring of ‘sour grapes’ about it at times, its publication at the very least signals that its time for some decent debate of Florida’s theories.

You can also view Florida’s response to the article here. And if you’re still not tuckered out from all that reading, here’s Bures’ response to Florida’s response. Not sure if Florida has responded to Bures’ response to his response yet…

To Risk or Not to Risk

In a few humourously succinct minutes author and playwright Michael Gurr manages to capture the torment that is the grant application process. While he focuses on the experience of the artist, the pain is just as inscrutable for any creator (be you scientist or educator) attempting to quantify the often unquantifiable.

One of the tragedies of our governments’ adoption of market based economic thinking has been the loss of a capacity to support the development of ideas without the need to insist upon a bogus language of publicly defensible outcomes. While governments have an inalienable right to justify public expenditure, I can’t help but question how public value is really being achieved through a funding process that has, at its heart, the fear of creative risk-taking.

Governments are just made up of people of course, so if we delve a little more deeply they can be a useful mirror to our own selves – perhaps those parts we most detest and wish to disown. So when I put it that way, what is it about creative process that I’m so fearful of? that makes me want to lock it down into some kind of certain outcome that I can defend?

Well…I guess in choosing to embark on a creative process I really have to let go of the illusion of control and the fact that I don’t have all the answers…and that’s kinda scary. What if my idea turns out to be a turkey? or worse, what if I end up my wearing my insides on my outside, my vulnerability and failure exposed for all the world to see??

So if I follow the logic of government I can diminish the risk of a creative process by locking it down with a prescribed outcome – genius! There is one problem with this of course…risk is not the only thing that’s diminished.